|
|
“Active Courts and Menu Contracts”
Georgetown University, mimeo, 2006.
Abstract: We describe and
analyze a contractual environment that allows a role for an active court. The
model we analyze is the same as in Anderlini, Felli
and Postlewaite (2006). An active court can improve on the outcome that
the parties would achieve without it. The institutional role of the court is
to maximize the parties' welfare under a veil of ignorance.
In Anderlini,
Felli and Postlewaite (2006) the possibility of “menu contracts” between
the informed buyer and the uninformed seller is described but not fully
analyzed. Here, we fully analyze this case.
We find that if we maintain the
assumption that one of the potential objects of trade is not contractible
ex-ante, the results of Anderlini, Felli and Postlewaite
(2006) survive intact. If however we let all “widgets” be contractible
ex-ante, then multiple equilibria obtain. In this case the role for an active
court is to ensure the inefficient pooling equilibria do not exist alongside
the superior ones in which separation occurs.
Download: PDF
File.
|
|