Institutional
Theory of Art and the Artworld
Overview by Martin Irvine
The function of the artworld as a social-economic
network
- The primary function of the artworld is continually to define, validate,
and maintain the cultural category of art, and to produce the consent
of the entire society in the legitimacy of the artworld's authority
to do so.
- The artworld is thus part of our system of professions,
and many parts of the artworld network are now highly professionalized
and careerist.
- As in all institutions as interdependent networks, you don't need to know you are participating
in the artworld to be carrying out its primary cultural function.
- Compare Arthur Danto's and Pierre Bourdieu's views:
- the artworld as the provider of an operational theory of art that
participants use to distinguish art from non-art (Danto).
- the artworld as conditioned or determined by social and economic lived positions, requiring knowledge and ownership of cultural capital as part of social class identity, the theory or concepts of art following learned professional and social class distinctions (Bourdieu).
- The artworld network is the ground of possibility for anything
to appear as art for us today.
- Think of the artworld institution as the complex field of forces
which constitute art works as such, providing the context and rules for the possibility of something appearing
to us as art per se.
- The artworld also provides the structure of symbolic capital (Bourdieu): value, prestige, and other intangible factors that are fungible values--exchangeable for
money.
- What makes something an artwork is invisible: there's no "there
there" outside a position in the artworld network.
- What makes something an artwork is not an observable property
in an artwork itself.
- The work is a node in a network of forces without which it would
be unrecognizable-- literally invisible.
Value of an institutional approach to understanding
the Artworld
- Provides a way of describing the social and economic conditions that
make art possible today.
- Can be plugged into a complexity or systems model like mediology.
- Opens up analysis of the art work itself as being constituted by a
complex field of forces that are not visible in art object itself, but
are the grounds of possibility for art to appear for us at all.
- A constitutive, contingent, and interdependent view.
- Situates art, art making, art exhibition, and the art market in a
large social and economic field of interdependent communities of social
actors, whose exchanges and working agreements constitute the art world
as such.
- Removes solitary individual agency (artist, art viewer) from the question
of art (what is art? how does a work become art? does it have to be
good to be art?).
- The art world is a social and economic network, and, like all networks,
has externalities or network effects that create more incentives to
be connected to the network than disincentives to remain disconnected.
Contributors
to the Institutional Theory of Art
Arthur Danto first gave the notion of the "artworld"
a philosophical definition: the artworld provides the theories of art
which all members of the artworld tacitly assume in order for there to
be objects considered as art (see "The
Artworld," Journal of Philosophy (1964)).
- Approaching the question from the point of view of epistemology, definitions
of concepts, and interpretation (hermeneutics).
- The artworld does circulate theories about art, and expects members
to know them, but there's more to the artworld "club" in operational,
social, and economic terms.
George Dickie’s institutional theory of art (Professor of Philosophy
at the University of Illinois-Chicago), stated and restated in two books:
Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca: NY: Cornell
UP, 1974. Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Chicago: Spectrum Press,
1997.
|
Dickie’s first attempt to construct an institutional (social-contextual-relational)
definition of art (1974 version). "A work of art in the classificatory
sense is:
- (1)an [original] artifact
- (2) a set of the aspects of which has had conferred upon it
- the status of candidate for appreciation
- by some person or persons acting on behalf of a certain social
institution (the artworld)." (p.464)
Revision of basic definition in 1997:
- "A work of art is an artifact of a kind created to be presented
to an artworld public.
- An artist is a person who participates with understanding in
the making of a work of art.
- A public is a set of persons the members of which are prepared
in some degree to understand an object which is presented to them.
- The artworld is the totality of all artworld systems.
- An artworld system is a framework for the presentation of a
work of art by an artist to an artworld public"
Explanations of terms:
- "artifact" - means that human intentionality is present,
including the case choosing a found object or "readymade"
- conferring of status by an artworld agent or context (analogy
to conferring of knighthood, legal indictment)
- "candidate for appreciation" - also means a candidate
for consideration as an artwork; object may not be appreciated
at all, but is offered up as such by the artworld
- the institution - who does this include?
- "essential core" vs peripheral group (dealer, curator, collector)
- Prime examples of the theory at work -- Duchamp’s readymades,
Warhol's appropriated images and Brillo boxes.
Significance:
- The first theory which does not appeal to a feature of the art
object (some essential recognizable "artness" in an
object).
- Only interested in the classification of an art object as such,
how an object becomes art, not in quality, value, or any other
traditional art problem.
- The first theory which takes into account the context of the
work of art--specifically, the artworld, the social context of
reception and the construction of meaning and value.
- Art status and value separated--non-prescriptive definition
in terms of what should be valued or whether any object has value.
|
Howard Becker, Art Worlds (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1982)
- Written after Dickie, attempts to define what makes up an artworld
using sociological methodology.
- Important points: Artworlds involve collective activities and
shared conventions.
- Defines art by collective activities that constitute the production
of art, not by the end products (art works).
- Circumvents the pseudo-problem of defining art by some essential property
in the works themselves.
- Defines artworld members and the cooperation of individuals in creating
a whole artworld system.
- The system, not any individual, constitutes an art object. An art
object as such only lives within a social system.
|
Basic assumptions in Becker's theory:
- "The existence of art worlds, as well as the way their existence
affects both the production and consumption of art work, suggests
a sociological approach to the arts". (p.1)
- "The artist thus works in the center of a network of cooperating
people, all of whose work is essential to the final outcome."
(p.25)
- "The artist’s involvement with and dependence on cooperative
links thus constrains the kind of art he can produce." (p.26)
- "Conventions regulate the relations between artists and audience,
specifying the rights and obligations of both." (p.29) "Conventions
make possible the easy and efficient coordination of activity
among artists and support personnel." (p.30).
- "[A]rt worlds typically have intimate and extensive relations
with the worlds from which they try to distinguish themselves.
They share sources of supply with those other worlds, recruit
personnel from them, adopt ideas that originate in them, and compete
with them for audiences and financial support." (p.36)
- See Becker's recent definition of art worlds in "A
New Art Form: Hypertext Fiction."
|
Pierre Bourdieu's view of the Art World
- Social class education, "ownership" of art environments,
shared social-class expectations.
- Social class values determine what gets in and what stays out, who's
inside and who's outside of the art world.
- See Pierre Bourdieu, "The
Production of Belief," 1977 and 1983 (excerpts).
Summing Up:
The Artworld as Social-Economic Network
- The Artworld is made visible in the activities of
art world institutions (social and economic networks, organizations,
corporations).
- The art work is always presented in institutional
context, an art world "container" (galleries, museums, alternative
art spaces, biennials, large and small curated exhibitions, catalogues).
- The Artworld is really an aggregation of art worlds,
a network emerging from many smaller micro-worlds, subcommunities, all
with greater or lesser knowledge of the entire network.
- Artworld institutions create the visible structure
and hierarchies in the presentation of art in a sliding scale from:
- the blockbuster museum shows of canonized artists
(e.g. "Matisse-Picasso" at MoMA)
- the major artist's retrospective (e.g., Richter)
as capstone to career and institutional valorization
- first museum shows for rising stars
- major gallery shows in the art power cities
- gallery shows in lesser cities
- first shows for artists beginning their careers
in alternative or university art spaces
Artworld Network: The Political
Economy of the Artworld
The art world is structured as an interdependent network of social-economic
actors who cooperate--often contentiously or unknowing--to enact and perpetuate the
art world, while at the same time negotiating kinds and levels of cooperation
in a mutually understood careerist and competitive context.
- art schools, colleges, and professional art teachers
- artists
- art historians and academic art theorists
- art critics, art writers
- art periodical publishers, magazine editors and professional production staff
- book publishing industry for art books, monographs, museum exhibitions
- professional associations for artists, educators,
and dealers
- art dealers and galleries
- curators, museum directors, other museum professionals
- public and private art
collection managers
- international art fair organizers, corporations, supporters, funders
- managers and organizations for international art exhibitions (biennials, Documenta,
etc.)
- art collectors
- art patrons, donors, public art funders
- private arts support foundations, both direct grants to artists and funding of art organizations (museums, non-profit spaces, university galleries, etc.) (connected to general economy through invested endowments and private contributions)
- all staff levels in art funding organizations: public
(local, state, and federal government) and private (foundations, corporate
art funding)
- auction houses and art business professionals in the auction companies
- art consultants
- art investment advisors
- art insurance companies
- art market data companies and publishers
- art advertising and art marketing specialists
- directors of non-profit and alternative art spaces
- art materials suppliers and materials fabricators
- conservators, art materials specialists
- museum and collections security systems, climate control,
archiving
Doing research: Build out the big picture when
studying an artist, an art work, a movement, an art genre
- Situate art work in the constitutive network of relations
to disclose how the work came to be included in the artworld.
- Who were the necessary actors, what institutions and
artworld containers defined the work, what were the social-economic
conditions (follow the money), how was the work/artist received in the
artworld, what were the contexts for interpretation
Continue: Artworld
Case Studies: consider examples of art works in their conditions
of production and reception in the artworld.
Martin Irvine, 2003-2008 |